LIN TCHIA YENG

(Fonte: Lattes)
Índice h a partir de 2011
14
Lattes
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Instituto de Ortopedia e Traumatologia, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/41 - Laboratório de Investigação Médica do Sistema Músculoesquelético, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina
LIM/62 - Laboratório de Fisiopatologia Cirúrgica, Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina

Filtros

Limpar filtros

Configurações

Resultados de Busca

Agora exibindo 1 - 10 de 85
  • bookPart
    Opioides
    (2019) TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; YENG, Lin Tchia
  • bookPart
    Dor Pelviperineal
    (2019) ZAKKA, Telma Regina Mariotto; YENG, Lin Tchia; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen
  • article 40 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Thoracic sympathetic block for the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome type I: A double-blind randomized controlled study
    (2014) ROCHA, Roberto de Oliveira; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; YENG, Lin Tchia; CANTARA, Mirlene Gardin; FARIA, Viviane Gentil; LIGGIERI, Victor; LODUCA, Adrianna; MUELLER, Barbara Maria; SOUZA, Andrea C. M. S.; ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de
    Pain relief in complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) remains a major challenge, in part due to the lack of evidence-based treatment trials specific for this condition. We performed a long-term randomized, double-blinded active-control study to evaluate the efficacy of thoracic sympathetic block (TSB) for upper limb type I CRPS. The study objective was to evaluate the analgesic effect of TSB in CRPS. Patients with CRPS type I were treated with standardized pharmacological and physical therapy and were randomized to either TSB or control procedure as an add-on treatment. Clinical data, pain intensity, and interference (Brief Pain Inventory), pain dimensions (McGill Pain Questionnaire [MPQ]), neuropathic characteristics (Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory [NPSI]), mood, upper limb function (Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand), and quality of life were assessed before, and at 1 month and 12 months after the procedure. Thirty-six patients (19 female, 44.7 +/- 11.1 years of age) underwent the procedure (17 in the TSB group). Average pain intensity at 1 month was not significantly different after TSB (3.5 +/- 3.2) compared to control procedure (4.8 +/- 2.7; P = 0.249). At 12 months, however, the average pain item was significantly lower in the TSB group (3.47 +/- 3.5) compared to the control group (5.86 +/- 2.9; P = 0.046). Scores from the MPQ, evoked-pain symptoms subscores (NPSI), and depression scores (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were significantly lower in the TSB group compared to the control group at 1 and at 12 months. Other measurements were not influenced by the treatment. Quality of life was only slightly improved by TSB. No major adverse events occurred. Larger, multicentric trials should be performed to confirm these original findings.
  • article 10 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Cavernous carotid artery aneurysms: Epidemiology, natural history, diagnostic and treatment. An experience of a single institution
    (2014) ROSI JUNIOR, Jefferson; WELLING, Leonardo C.; YENG, Lin Tchia; CALDAS, Jose Guilherme; SCHAFRANSKI, Marcelo; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; FIGUEIREDO, Eberval Gadelha
    Background: Cavernous carotid aneurysms (CCA) account for 2-9% of all intracranial aneurysms. They have been considered benign lesions, most often asymptomatic, and to have a natural history with a low risk of life-threatening complications. These aneurysms are unique, their rupture can present in many different forms, they can suffer spontaneous thrombotic changes and the symptomatology related to the mass effect involves the neuro-ophthalmologic system. In this scenario the natural history and clinical presentation are largely different from other intracranial aneurysms. Some investigators advocate treatment of both symptomatic and asymptomatic CCAs, others recommend no treatment. The reason for this controversy relates to a lack of information on the long term natural history of these aneurysms, as well as on the long term results of treatment. Methods: In this article the authors discuss their single institution experience in diagnosis, natural history and management of 123 asymptomatic and oligosympotomatic aneurysms located in the cavernous portion of internal carotid artery. Conclusions: According to our results asymptomatic or olygosymptomatic (pain) CCAs should be conservatively managed with serial images while the others presentations should be analyzed by a multidisciplinary team, involving the neuroendovascular and microsurgical services.
  • bookPart
    Prefácio
    (2022) YENG, Lin Tchia
  • bookPart
    Dor: Evolução Histórica dos Acontecimentos
    (2019) TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; YENG, Lin Tchia
  • bookPart
    Medicina Fisica e Reabilitação em Doentes com Dor Crônica
    (2019) YENG, Lin Tchia; PAI, Marcus Yu Bin; KOBAYASHI, Ricardo; TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; JR, Jefferson Rosi
  • bookPart
    Tratamento da Dor em Condições Especiais
    (2019) TEIXEIRA, Manoel Jacobsen; YENG, Lin Tchia; MUSOLINO, Nina Rosa de Castro
  • bookPart
    Avaliação clínica dos doentes com dor crônica
    (2022) YENG, Lin Tchia; KOBAYASHI, Ricardo; LODUCA, Adrianna; KOBAYASHI, Carolina Besser Cozac; MüLLER, Barbara Maria; LIGGIERI, André Cicone
  • article 5 Citação(ões) na Scopus
    Sifting the wheat from the chaff? Evidence for the existence of an asymmetric fibromyalgia phenotype
    (2020) KAZIYAMA, Helena H.; BARBOUR, Julio; GALHARDONI, Ricardo; SILVA, Valquiria Aparecida da; SIQUEIRA, Silvia R. D. Tesseroli de; LISTIK, Clarice; SANTOS, Gabriel Jose dos; YENG, Lin T.; MARCOLIN, Marco Antonio; RAICHER, Irina; TEIXEIRA, Manoel J.; ANDRADE, Daniel Ciampi de
    Background The different phenotypic presentations of fibromyalgia (FM) have been infrequently studied and may have diagnostic and therapeutic implications. The aim of this study was to explore differences between FM patients with classical symmetric (s-FM) presentation and FM patients with marked asymmetric (a-FM) pain. Methods We performed two consecutive cross-sectional studies on FM patients and matched healthy volunteers (HV). FM patients were divided into a-FM (and s-FM groups according to their score of pain intensity on each body side; patients with a difference of >= 40 mm in VAS between left and right sides were classified as a-FM, otherwise classified as s-FM. Participants (FM = 32; HV = 31) were assessed for clinical, cortical excitability (CE), quantitative sensory testing (QST; study 1), and intraepidermal nerve fibre density (IENFD) determinations (study 2). Results While pain intensity did not significantly differ between s-FM and a-FM patients, pain interference in daily activities was significantly higher in the a-FM as compared to the s-FM group (54.7 +/- 8.9 and 37.6 +/- 13.5;p < .0001). PPT was significantly lower in the more painful side of a-FM as compared to the HV (27.7 +/- 7.9 and 49.9 +/- 13.0;p < .0001), while PPT in the less painful side of a-FM was significantly higher than PPT values in the s-FM (35.8 +/- 8.3 and 27.7 +/- 5.5;p = .031). S-FM and a-FM had significantly abnormal intracortical inhibition values on CE measurements compared to HV. There were no significant differences in IENFD between groups. Conclusions Within the current FM criteria, there exist different phenotypes with clinical, psychophysics, and neurophysiological findings that are not related to peripheral IENFD abnormalities. Significance Current fibromyalgia criteria may contain different phenotypes of fibromyalgia based on the lateralization of pain.