A BEAT-PCD consensus statement: a core outcome set for pulmonary disease interventions in primary ciliary dyskinesia

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2024
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
Autores
KOS, Renate
GOUTAKI, Myrofora
KOBBERNAGEL, Helene E.
RUBBO, Bruna
SHOEMARK, Amelia
ALIBERTI, Stefano
ALTENBURG, Josje
ANAGNOSTOPOULOU, Pinelopi
BEYDON, Nicole
Citação
ERJ OPEN RESEARCH, v.10, n.1, article ID 00115-2023, 11p, 2024
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background Consistent use of reliable and clinically appropriate outcome measures is a priority for clinical trials, with clear definitions to allow comparability. We aimed to develop a core outcome set (COS) for pulmonary disease interventions in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD). Methods A multidisciplinary international PCD expert panel was set up. A list of outcomes was created based on published literature. Using a modified three-round e-Delphi technique, the panel was asked to decide on relevant end-points related to pulmonary disease interventions and how they should be reported. First, inclusion of an outcome in the COS was determined. Second, the minimum information that should be reported per outcome. The third round finalised statements. Consensus was defined as >= 80% agreement among experts. Results During the first round, experts reached consensus on four out of 24 outcomes to be included in the COS. Five additional outcomes were discussed in subsequent rounds for their use in different subsettings. Consensus on standardised methods of reporting for the COS was reached. Spirometry, health-related quality-of-life scores, microbiology and exacerbations were included in the final COS. Conclusion This expert consensus resulted in a COS for clinical trials on pulmonary health among people with PCD.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. Amaral MD, 2022, CURR OPIN PHARMACOL, V63, DOI 10.1016/j.coph.2022.102201
  2. Barbato A, 2009, EUR RESPIR J, V34, P1264, DOI 10.1183/09031936.00176608
  3. Behan L, 2019, PEDIATR PULM, V54, P2011, DOI 10.1002/ppul.24507
  4. Behan L, 2017, THORAX, V72, P832, DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209356
  5. COMET Management Group, The COMET Initiative
  6. Gahleitner F, 2021, ERJ OPEN RES, V7, DOI 10.1183/23120541.00320-2021
  7. Gardner Laura E, 2020, BMC Proc, V14, P7, DOI 10.1186/s12919-020-00191-3
  8. Goutaki M, 2021, EUR RESPIR J, V57, DOI 10.1183/13993003.04601-2020
  9. Goutaki M, 2020, ERJ OPEN RES, V6, DOI 10.1183/23120541.00237-2019
  10. Halbeisen FS, 2022, EUR RESPIR J, V60, DOI 10.1183/13993003.01918-2021
  11. Hannah WB, 2022, LANCET RESP MED, V10, P459, DOI 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00453-7
  12. Knowles MR, 2016, CLIN CHEST MED, V37, P449, DOI 10.1016/j.ccm.2016.04.008
  13. Kobbernagel HE, 2020, LANCET RESP MED, V8, P493, DOI 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30058-8
  14. Kuehni CE, 2018, ERS MONOGR, V81, P282, DOI 10.1183/2312508X.10016717
  15. Kuehni CE, 2017, EUR RESPIR J, V49, DOI 10.1183/13993003.02514-2016
  16. Lucas JS, 2019, ERJ OPEN RES, V5, DOI 10.1183/23120541.00147-2018
  17. Lucas JS, 2017, EXPERT REV RESP MED, V11, P779, DOI 10.1080/17476348.2017.1360770
  18. Marthin JK, 2021, ERJ OPEN RES, V7, DOI 10.1183/23120541.00301-2021
  19. Marthin JK, 2010, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V181, P1262, DOI 10.1164/rccm.200811-1731OC
  20. Mathioudakis AG, 2022, EUR RESPIR J, V59, DOI 10.1183/13993003.02006-2021
  21. Needham DM, 2017, AM J RESP CRIT CARE, V196, P1122, DOI 10.1164/rccm.201702-0372OC
  22. Paff T, 2021, INT J MOL SCI, V22, DOI 10.3390/ijms22189834
  23. Paff T, 2017, EUR RESPIR J, V49, DOI 10.1183/13993003.01770-2016
  24. Raidt J, 2022, ERJ OPEN RES, V8, DOI 10.1183/23120541.00139-2022
  25. Smith PG, 2015, Field Trials of Health Interventions: a Toolbox, V3rd, P98
  26. Wallmeier J, 2020, NAT REV DIS PRIMERS, V6, DOI 10.1038/s41572-020-0209-6
  27. Zeevenhooven J, 2020, J PEDIATR-US, V221, P115, DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.02.032