Prevalence and association of compliance with the Canadian 24-hour movement guidelines with sociodemographic aspects in Brazilian adults: a cross-sectional epidemiological study

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2024
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Dimensions
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
BMC
Autores
DELFINO, Leandro Dragueta
CHRISTOFARO, Diego Giulliano Destro
Citação
BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, v.24, n.1, article ID 262, 10p, 2024
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background The physical inactivity is a global health concern, so that recommendations on sufficient physical activity levels are elaborated worldwide, such as in Brazil. However, the Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines were first in the world to consider time-specific recommendations for physical activity, sedentary behavior and sleep, which is still not developed for Latin-American population. The present study aimed to verify the adherence to Canadian 24-hour guidelines in a Brazilian inner city and to analyze its association with sociodemographic aspects. Methods A cross-sectional epidemiological study, with a sample composed by 250 adults (140 women), with a median age of 41.0 years. Objective measures of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behavior were collected by accelerometry. Sleep duration and sociodemographic aspects (ethnicity, gender, age, educational attainment and socioeconomic level) were obtained through a face-to-face questionnaire. Canadian 24-hour guidelines considered >= 150 min/week of MVPA, <8 h/day of sedentary behavior and daily sleep time between 7 and 9 h, being analyzed separately and in combination. Poisson regression with robust variance estimator was used to analyze the prevalence ratio (PR) of meeting the 24-hour guidelines according to the categories of sociodemographic variables, being performed by the software IBM SPSS version 25.0. Results The complete 24-hour guidelines were met only by 24.4% of sample (n = 61). Sedentary behavior was the most met guideline (88%), followed by MVPA (56.8%) and sleep (53.2%), without significant difference according to sex. When compared to elderly participants, those participants in younger groups (18-39 years and 40-59 years) were more likely to meet MVPA guideline (PR = 2.51 [95%CI = 1.47; 4.28] and PR = 2.60 [95%CI = 1.52; 4.45], respectively), as well as the combination of MVPA and sedentary behavior (PR = 1.98 [95%CI = 1.13; 3.44] and PR = 2.17 [95%CI = 1.25; 3.79], respectively) and MVPA with the sleep guideline (PR = 2.39 [95%CI = 1.09; 5.27] only for 18-39 years group). Men were more likely to meet MVPA guideline than women (PR = 1.29 [95%CI = 1.04; 1.59]). Conclusion Younger aged and male adults were more likely to meet the Canadian 24-hour guidelines in a small Brazilian city. However, further studies with larger and representative samples of sociodemographic stratum are still needed.
Palavras-chave
Guideline adherence, Physical activity, Sedentary behavior, Sleep duration, Socioeconomic factors
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/59263
Referências
  1. [Anonymous], 2009, GLOBAL HEALTH RISKS: MORTALITY AND BURDEN OF DISEASE ATTRIBUTABLE TO SELECTED MAJOR RISKS, P1
  2. Bauman A, 2009, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V6, DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-6-21
  3. Bauman AE, 2018, SPRINGER SER EPIDEMI, P73, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-61552-3_4
  4. Bauman AE, 2012, LANCET, V380, P258, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60735-1
  5. Bertolazi AN, 2011, SLEEP MED, V12, P70, DOI 10.1016/j.sleep.2010.04.020
  6. de Souza PRB, 2015, EPIDEMIOL SERV SAUDE, V24, P207, DOI 10.5123/S1679-49742015000200003
  7. Brazilian Association of Research Companies (ABEP), 2015, Brazilian Criteria for Economic Classification
  8. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, Demographic census 2010
  9. BUYSSE DJ, 1989, PSYCHIAT RES, V28, P193, DOI 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
  10. Carlson SA, 2010, AM J PREV MED, V39, P305, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.06.006
  11. CASPERSEN CJ, 1985, PUBLIC HEALTH REP, V100, P126
  12. Chastin S, 2021, BRIT J SPORT MED, V55, P1277, DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102345
  13. Craig CL, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P1381, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB
  14. Delfino LD, 2022, UNIVERSA MED, V41, P101, DOI 10.18051/UnivMed.2022.v41.101-103
  15. Dias-da-Costa Juvenal Soares, 2005, Cad. Saúde Pública, V21, P275, DOI 10.1590/S0102-311X2005000100030
  16. Ekelund U, 2019, BRIT J SPORT MED, V53, P886, DOI 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098963
  17. Ferrari G, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-15504-z
  18. Ferrari G, 2022, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12889-022-12613-2
  19. Füzéki E, 2017, SPORTS MED, V47, P1769, DOI 10.1007/s40279-017-0724-0
  20. Guthold R, 2018, LANCET GLOB HEALTH, V6, pE1077, DOI [10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30357-7, 10.1016/s2214-109x(18)30357-7]
  21. Hallal PC, 2003, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V35, P1894, DOI 10.1249/01.MSS.0000093615.33774.0E
  22. Hallal PC, 2012, LANCET, V380, P247, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1
  23. Hunter Sandra K, 2023, Med Sci Sports Exerc, V55, P2328, DOI 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003300
  24. IBGE. Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, 2021, Mesh of census sectors, intra-municipal divisions
  25. Kaikkonen KM, 2014, J PHYS ACT HEALTH, V11, P1614, DOI 10.1123/jpah.2012-0405
  26. Kindratt TB, 2023, J RACIAL ETHN HEALTH, DOI 10.1007/s40615-023-01702-6
  27. Lavie CJ, 2015, MAYO CLIN PROC, V90, P1541, DOI 10.1016/j.mayocp.2015.08.001
  28. Lee IM, 2012, LANCET, V380, P219, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61031-9
  29. Liangruenrom N, 2020, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V17, DOI 10.1186/s12966-020-01011-9
  30. Magnon V, 2018, FRONT PUBLIC HEALTH, V6, DOI 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00372
  31. Marques A, 2015, PREV MED, V81, P333, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.018
  32. Matias TS, 2022, QUEST, V74, P180, DOI 10.1080/00336297.2021.2024442
  33. Mielke GI, 2022, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-12428-7
  34. Miot Hélio Amante, 2011, J. vasc. bras., V10, P275
  35. Molina-García J, 2019, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V16, DOI 10.3390/ijerph16173176
  36. Owen N, 2020, ANNU REV PUBL HEALTH, V41, P265, DOI 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094201
  37. Pace-Schott EF, 2011, PROG BRAIN RES, V191, P75, DOI 10.1016/B978-0-444-53752-2.00012-6
  38. Patterson R, 2018, EUR J EPIDEMIOL, V33, P811, DOI 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1
  39. Plasqui G, 2007, OBESITY, V15, P2371, DOI 10.1038/oby.2007.281
  40. Riquelme R, 2022, SCI REP-UK, V12, DOI 10.1038/s41598-022-09729-1
  41. Rollo S, 2020, J SPORT HEALTH SCI, V9, P493, DOI 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.07.004
  42. Ross R, 2020, APPL PHYSIOL NUTR ME, V45, pS57, DOI 10.1139/apnm-2020-0467
  43. Saint-Maurice PF, 2018, J AM HEART ASSOC, V7, DOI 10.1161/JAHA.118.008815
  44. Sasaki JE, 2011, J SCI MED SPORT, V14, P411, DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003
  45. Scully M, 2022, BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12889-021-12387-z
  46. Soares AHG, 2023, J AGING PHYS ACTIV, V31, P756, DOI 10.1123/japa.2022-0200
  47. Stalsberg R, 2018, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V15, DOI 10.3390/ijerph15050922
  48. Stamatakis E, 2012, PREV MED, V54, P82, DOI 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.10.009
  49. Tebar WR, 2019, MEDICINE, V98, DOI 10.1097/MD.0000000000017400
  50. Tebar WR, 2021, J CARDIOVASC TRANSL, V14, P975, DOI 10.1007/s12265-021-10101-3
  51. Tremblay MS, 2020, J SPORT HEALTH SCI, V9, P479, DOI 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.09.012
  52. Tremblay MS, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
  53. Troiano RP, 2008, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V40, P181, DOI 10.1249/mss.0b013e31815a51b3
  54. Trost SG, 2005, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V37, pS531, DOI 10.1249/01.mss.0000185657.86065.98
  55. Tucker JM, 2011, AM J PREV MED, V40, P454, DOI 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.12.016
  56. van der Ploeg HP, 2017, INT J BEHAV NUTR PHY, V14, DOI 10.1186/s12966-017-0601-0
  57. Wyke S, 2019, PLOS MED, V16, DOI 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002736
  58. ,, 2010, Global recommendations on physical activity for health

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HU