Rotator cuff repair in patients 50 years of age or younger: A comparative study of functional outcomes in relation to older patients

Imagem de Miniatura
Arquivos
art_ASSUNCAO_Rotator_cuff_repair_in_patients_50_years_of_2023.PDF (289.78 KB)
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER MASSON, CORP OFF
Autores
Citação
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, v.109, n.7, article ID 103660, 6p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background: Few studies have evaluated the clinical results of surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears in young patients and most of the publications are only case series and with a small number of evaluated individuals. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair according to age at the time of the procedure.Hypothesis: Patients with 50 years of age or younger undergoing surgical treatment of rotator cuff tear have similar clinical outcomes to older patients.Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study comparing results obtained after surgical treatment of rotator cuff tears between patients aged 50 years or younger and the older patients by the ASES and UCLA functional scales. Patients undergoing arthroscopy full-thickness rotator cuff repair were included.Results: We evaluated 390 shoulders (377 patients), 94 aged 50 years or younger (median = 46.5 years) and 296 aged over 50 years (median = 60 years). Both groups significantly improved with the procedure after 24 months of follow-up, according to the ASES and UCLA scales (p < 0.001). The groups did not differ in the scores obtained in the preoperative assessments and at 24 months of follow-up. The score obtained on the ASES scale at 24 months of follow-up had a median of 87.2 (IQR = 38) among patients aged 50 years or younger and 90 points (IQR = 26.4) among older patients (p = 0.253). The scores obtained by the UCLA scale were 31 points (IQR = 9) and 33 points (IQR =7) respectively (p = 0.156).Discussion: Our results showed that, after 24 months, the functional results of arthroscopic full-thickness rotator cuff repair did not differ between patients younger than 50 years and older patients. These results are similar to those found by other authors. Both groups of patients achieved significant improvement after the surgical procedure, achieving approximately 90 points on the ASES scale and 32 points on the UCLA scale.(c) 2023 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Palavras-chave
Arthroscopy, Rotator cuff tear, Prognostic factors, Elderly, Young adults
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/57722
Referências
  1. Assunçao JH, 2017, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V26, P1137, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2017.01.025
  2. Burns JP, 2008, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V17, P90, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2007.05.006
  3. Cole BJ, 2007, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V16, P579, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2006.12.011
  4. CONSTANT CR, 1987, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P160
  5. Dwyer T, 2015, KNEE SURG SPORT TR A, V23, P508, DOI 10.1007/s00167-014-3094-2
  6. ELLMAN H, 1986, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V68A, P1136, DOI 10.2106/00004623-198668080-00002
  7. Fuchs B, 1999, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V8, P599, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(99)90097-6
  8. Gartsman GM, 1998, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V80A, P832, DOI 10.2106/00004623-199806000-00007
  9. Hantes ME, 2018, AM J SPORT MED, V46, P116, DOI 10.1177/0363546517728718
  10. Haunschild ED, 2021, AM J SPORT MED, V49, P2238, DOI 10.1177/0363546520975426
  11. Hawkins RJ, 1999, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V8, P259
  12. Holtby R, 2010, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V19, P452, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2009.06.011
  13. Katolik LI, 2005, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V14, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2004.10.009
  14. Khazzam Michael, 2020, JSES Int, V4, P625, DOI 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.03.014
  15. Knaut LA, 2010, REV BRAS REUMATOL, V50, P176, DOI 10.1590/S0482-50042010000200007
  16. Krishnan SG, 2008, ARTHROSCOPY, V24, P324, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2007.09.005
  17. Lafosse L, 2007, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V89A, P1533, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.F.00305
  18. Lin EC, 2013, ARTHROSCOPY, V29, P811, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.01.015
  19. Miyazaki Alberto Naoki, 2011, Rev. bras. ortop., V46, P276, DOI [10.1016/S2255-4971(15)30195-6, 10.1590/S0102-36162011000300008]
  20. Moraiti C, 2015, ARTHROSCOPY, V31, P184, DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.08.020
  21. Motley Gregory S, 2002, Arthroscopy, V18, pE46, DOI 10.1053/jars.2002.36465
  22. Oku Elaine Cristina, 2006, Rev. Bras. Reumatol., V46, P246, DOI 10.1590/S0482-50042006000400003
  23. Razmjou H, 2012, PHYSIOTHER CAN, V64, P135, DOI 10.3138/ptc.2010-51
  24. Pécora JOR, 2015, ACTA ORTOP BRAS, V23, P146, DOI 10.1590/1413-78522015230300992
  25. Richards R R, 1994, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V3, P347, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(09)80019-0
  26. Russell RD, 2014, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V96A, P265, DOI 10.2106/JBJS.M.00265
  27. SAMILSON RL, 1983, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V65, P456, DOI 10.2106/00004623-198365040-00005
  28. Sperling JW, 2004, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V86A, P2212, DOI 10.2106/00004623-200410000-00012
  29. Yamamoto A, 2010, J SHOULDER ELB SURG, V19, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jse.2009.04.006

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/41