A 12-month follow-up split-scalp study comparing calcipotriol-assisted MAL-PDT with conventional MAL-PDT for the treatment of actinic keratosis: a randomized controlled trial

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
9
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2021
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
JOHN LIBBEY EUROTEXT LTD
Autores
HAEDERSDAL, Merete
SZEIMIES, Rolf-Markus
Citação
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, v.31, n.5, p.638-644, 2021
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background To enhance the efficacy of photodynamic therapy (PDT) for actinic keratosis (AKs), physical and chemical pre-treatments, such as calcipotriol (CAL) have been suggested. Objectives To compare the long-term 12-month efficacy and safety between methylaminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT and prior application of topical CAL versus conventional MAL-PDT for AKs of the scalp. Materials & Methods Twenty patients with multiple AKs on the scalp were randomized to receive conventional PDT on one side of the scalp and CAL-assisted PDT, in which CAL was applied daily for 15 days beforehand, on the other side. Patients were evaluated for AK clearance at three, six and 12 months thereafter. Results All 20 patients completed the study. At three months, overall AK clearance was 92.07% and 82.04% for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT, respectively (p < 0.001). Similar results were found at six and 12 months: 92.07% and 81.69% (p < 0.001), and 90.69% and 77.46% (p < 0.001) for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT, respectively. Grade I AKs showed a similar response rate for both sides (p = 0.055) at three months and significant differences were obtained at six (p = 0.001) and 12 months (p < 0.001) for CAL-PDT and conventional PDT. Grade II AKs showed greater improvement on the CAL-PDT side (89.55% vs 62.90%) (p < 0.001) at three months. No difference was found at six and 12 months. Conclusion CAL-PDT proved to be safe and more effective than conventional PDT for the treatment of AKs on the scalp after 12 months. CAL pre-treatment may have enhanced the efficacy of PDT for AK treatment, however, larger trials are needed to corroborate our findings.
Palavras-chave
actinic keratosis (AK), scalp, photodynamic therapy (PDT), methylaminolevulinate (MAL)-PDT, calcipotriol (CAL), efficacy and safety
Referências
  1. Anand S, 2011, CANCER RES, V71, P6040, DOI 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0805
  2. Bay C, 2016, J PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO B, V154, P34, DOI 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2015.11.009
  3. Bay C, 2015, PHOTODERMATOL PHOTO, V31, P57, DOI 10.1111/phpp.12150
  4. Calzavara-Pinton P, 2017, J CUTAN MED SURG, V21, p3S, DOI 10.1177/1203475417702994
  5. Cunningham TJ, 2017, J CLIN INVEST, V127, P106, DOI 10.1172/JCI89820
  6. Fernandez-Figueras MT, 2015, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V29, P991, DOI 10.1111/jdv.12848
  7. Gerritsen MJP, 2009, DERMATOLOGY, V218, P193, DOI 10.1159/000183753
  8. MARKS R, 1988, LANCET, V1, P795, DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91658-3
  9. Morton CA, 2013, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V27, P536, DOI 10.1111/jdv.12031
  10. Morton CA, 2018, AM J CLIN DERMATOL, V19, P647, DOI 10.1007/s40257-018-0360-y
  11. Nissen CV, 2016, PHOTODERMATOL PHOTO, V32, P146, DOI 10.1111/phpp.12236
  12. OLSEN EA, 1991, J AM ACAD DERMATOL, V24, P738, DOI 10.1016/0190-9622(91)70113-G
  13. Ortel B, 1998, BRIT J CANCER, V77, P1744, DOI 10.1038/bjc.1998.292
  14. Quaedvlieg PJF, 2006, EUR J DERMATOL, V16, P335
  15. Rollakanti K, 2015, PROC SPIE, V9308, DOI 10.1117/12.2077296
  16. Rosenberg AR, 2019, JCI INSIGHT, V4, DOI 10.1172/jci.insight.125476
  17. STERENBORG HJCM, 1986, PHOTODERMATOLOGY, V3, P206
  18. Szeimies RM, 2012, BRIT J DERMATOL, V167, P150, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10887.x
  19. Szeimies RM, 2010, BRIT J DERMATOL, V162, P410, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09377.x
  20. Torezan L, 2018, BRIT J DERMATOL, V179, P829, DOI 10.1111/bjd.16473
  21. Tschen EH, 2006, BRIT J DERMATOL, V155, P1262, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07520.x
  22. VonBrenken S, 1997, DERMATOLOGY, V194, P151, DOI 10.1159/000246085
  23. Werner RN, 2015, J EUR ACAD DERMATOL, V29, P2069, DOI 10.1111/jdv.13180
  24. Yang DF, 2014, PHOTODIAGN PHOTODYN, V11, P331, DOI 10.1016/j.pdpdt.2014.05.001