Outcome analysis and assessment of the lower pole expansion following breast augmentation with ergonomic implants: Optimizing results with patient selection based on 5-year data
Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
1
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2024
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
Autores
Citação
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, v.88, p.73-82, 2024
Resumo
Background: Silicone implants have gone through adaptations to improve esthetic outcomes. With the progress of technology, including gel rheology, different properties have been introduced. Ergonomic style implants (ESI) feature enhanced rheological properties and provide a shaped contour with a round base.Objectives: This study investigated outcomes for ESI in breast augmentation concerning lower pole stretching (LPS) and implant stability and describes an algorithm to assist in decision- making.Methods: A total of 148 patients (296 breasts) underwent breast augmentation with ESI; this procedure was indicated in patients with good skin quality and < 6 cm between the nip- ple-areola complex and the inframammary fold.Results: The mean patient age was 29.6 years (range: 19-39), and 93 patients (62.8%) under- went primary breast augmentation with demi/full projection (average volume of 245 cc [175-375 cc]). Axillary incision and subfascial pocket were indicated in 115 (77.7%) and 72 (48%) cases, respectively. Average LPS values were 32.2% (24.91 mm) and 10.86% (9.42 mm) at up to 10 days and 10 days to 12 months postprocedure, respectively. Patients were followed for a mean of 29.9 +/- 26.4 months (range: 6-66). Complication rates per breast and per patient were 5% and 10%, respectively, and included subcutaneous banding in the axilla (1.6%), implant displacement (1.2%), and wound dehiscence (0.8%). No cases of infection, seroma, or rippling complications were observed.Conclusions: The present decision-making algorithm summarizes the process involved in breast augmentation using ESI and is intended to help standardize decisions. With correct planning, long-lasting outcomes can be achieved due to favorable interactions between ESI and the patient's tissues.(c) 2023 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons.
Palavras-chave
Breast implants, Round implants, Anatomical implants, Ergonomic implants, Outcome, Complications
Referências
- Adams WP, 2017, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V139, P67, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002922
- Adams WP, 2016, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V138, P987, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002623
- Adams WP, 2012, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V130, p598E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318262f607
- Benito-Ruiz J, 2009, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V123, p31E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31819055b5
- Calobrace MB, 2021, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V148, P771, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008395
- Calobrace MB, 2014, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V134, p6S, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000347
- Chang EI, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V142, p31S, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005000
- clinicaltrials gov, Study of the safety and effectiveness of the motiva implants silicone gel-filled breast implants smoothsilk/silksurface in subjects who are undergoing primary breast augmentation, primary breast reconstruction, and revision surgery
- Doloff JC, 2021, NAT BIOMED ENG, V5, P1115, DOI 10.1038/s41551-021-00739-4
- Duncan AM, 2022, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V149, P28, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008671
- Tijerina VNE, 2010, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V34, P16, DOI 10.1007/s00266-009-9402-4
- Graf RM, 2000, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V24, P216, DOI 10.1007/s002660010036
- Hammond DC, 2014, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V134, p16S, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000617
- Hedén P, 2015, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000510
- Huemer GM, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V141, p831E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004367
- Jones P, 2018, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V142, P837, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004801
- Kahn R L, 1989, Int J Prosthodont, V2, P342
- Lin J, 2006, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V118, P1557, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000237002.89761.98
- Lista F, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V132, P1684, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a80880
- Lista F, 2013, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V132, P295, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182958a6d
- Mallucci P, 2016, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V137, P1728, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002230
- Matousek SA, 2014, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V133, P273, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000436798.20047.dc
- Maximiliano J, 2020, AESTHET SURG J, V40, pNP438, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa017
- Maxwell GP, 2015, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V3, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000388
- Maxwell GP, 2012, AESTHET SURG J, V32, P709, DOI 10.1177/1090820X12452423
- Montemurro P, 2021, AESTHET SURG J, V41, P189, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa169
- Montemurro P, 2016, AESTHET SURG J, V36, P966, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjw011
- Munhoz AM, 2006, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V30, P503, DOI 10.1007/s00266-006-0017-8
- Munhoz AM, 2022, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V150, P782, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009605
- Munhoz AM, 2022, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V46, P1116, DOI 10.1007/s00266-021-02726-1
- Munhoz AM, 2022, AESTHET PLAST SURG, V46, P1087, DOI 10.1007/s00266-021-02653-1
- Munhoz AM, 2021, AESTHET SURG J, V41, pNP364, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjab029
- Munhoz AM, 2020, AESTHET SURG J, V40, P1179, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjz339
- Munhoz AM, 2019, PRS-GLOB OPEN, V7, DOI 10.1097/GOX.0000000000002466
- Munhoz AM, 2020, AESTHET SURG J, V40, pNP356, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjz334
- Munhoz AM, 2017, CASE REP PLAST SURG, V4, P99, DOI 10.1080/23320885.2017.1407658
- Munhoz AM, 2015, CLIN PLAST SURG, V42, P565, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.016
- Rodrigues Filho Leonardo Eloy, 2003, Pesqui Odontol Bras, V17, P254
- Goes JCS, 2015, CLIN PLAST SURG, V42, P551, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2015.06.017
- Science of breast tissue management, 2019, Patient centric ergonomics and rheology of breast implants. Motiva Implant matrix silicone breast implants product summary
- Serra-Renom JM, 2005, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V116, P640, DOI 10.1097/01.prs.0000173558.52280.6e
- Sforza M, 2021, AESTHET SURG J, V41, pNP1143, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjaa297
- Sforza M, 2019, AESTHET SURG J, V39, pS95, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjz054
- Sforza M, 2018, AESTHET SURG J, V38, pS62, DOI 10.1093/asj/sjx150
- Tebbetts JB, 2002, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V109, P1396, DOI 10.1097/00006534-200204010-00030