Critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury treated with kidney replacement therapy: Comparison between the first and second pandemic waves in São Paulo, Brazil

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
Autores
SAMAAN, Farid
FREITAS, Rafaela Andrade Penalva
VIANA, Renata
GAMBARO, Livia
CUNHA, Karlla
VIEIRA, Tales Dantas
FEITOSA, Valkercyo
CORREA, Eric Aragao
MACIEL, Alexandre Toledo
ARANHA, Sylvia
Citação
PLOS ONE, v.18, n.11, article ID e0293846, 16p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
IntroductionThis study aimed to compare the characteristics and outcomes of critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) who were treated with kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in the first and second waves of the pandemic in the megalopolis of Sao Paulo, Brazil.MethodsA multicenter retrospective study was conducted in 10 intensive care units (ICUs). Patients aged >= 18 years, and treated with KRT due to COVID-19-associated AKI were included. We compared demographic, laboratory and clinical data, KRT parameters and patient outcomes in the first and second COVID-19 waves.ResultsWe assessed 656 patients (327 in the first wave and 329 in the second one). Second-wave patients were admitted later (7.1 +/- 5.0 vs. 5.6 +/- 3.9 days after the onset of symptoms, p<0.001), were younger (61.4 +/- 13.7 vs. 63.8 +/- 13.6 years, p = 0.023), had a lower frequency of diabetes (37.1% vs. 47.1%, p = 0.009) and obesity (29.5% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.007), had a greater need for vasopressors (93.3% vs. 84.6%, p<0.001) and mechanical ventilation (95.7% vs. 87.8%, p<0.001), and had higher lethality (84.8% vs. 72.7%, p<0.001) than first-wave patients. KRT quality markers were independently associated with a reduction in the OR for death in both pandemic waves.ConclusionsIn the Sao Paulo megalopolis, the lethality of critically ill patients with COVID-19-associated AKI treated with KRT was higher in the second wave of the pandemic, despite these patients being younger and having fewer comorbidities. Potential factors related to this poor outcome were difficulties in health care access, lack of intra-hospital resources, delay vaccination and virus variants.
Palavras-chave
Referências
  1. [Anonymous], 2020, WHO director-general's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19-11 March 2020
  2. Bezerra R, 2021, RENAL FAILURE, V43, P911, DOI 10.1080/0886022X.2021.1933530
  3. Bowe B, 2021, CLIN J AM SOC NEPHRO, V16, P14, DOI 10.2215/CJN.09610620
  4. Chan KW, 2021, FRONT MED-LAUSANNE, V8, DOI 10.3389/fmed.2021.678200
  5. Chan LL, 2021, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V32, P151, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2020050615
  6. Charytan DM, 2021, KIDNEY INT REP, V6, P916, DOI 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.01.036
  7. Chávez-íñiguez JS, 2023, NEPHRON, V147, P521, DOI 10.1159/000529588
  8. Chertow GM, 2005, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V16, P3365, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2004090740
  9. Cheruiyot Isaac, 2020, Acta Biomed, V91, pe2020029, DOI 10.23750/abm.v91i3.10222
  10. Clark WR, 2017, BLOOD PURIFICAT, V44, P140, DOI 10.1159/000475457
  11. Coccia M, 2021, ENVIRON RES, V197, DOI 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111099
  12. Ascencio-Montiel ID, 2022, BMC INFECT DIS, V22, DOI 10.1186/s12879-022-07800-w
  13. Dejnirattisai W, 2021, CELL, V184, P2939, DOI 10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.055
  14. Funk T, 2021, EUROSURVEILLANCE, V26, DOI 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.16.2100348
  15. Geetha D, 2022, NAT REV NEPHROL, V18, P724, DOI 10.1038/s41581-022-00618-4
  16. Graña C, 2022, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD015477
  17. Gray WK, 2022, THORAX, V77, P1113, DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2021-218025
  18. Gupta S, 2021, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V32, P161, DOI 10.1681/ASN.2020060897
  19. Hoogenboom WS, 2021, LANCET REG HEALTH-AM, V3, DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100041
  20. Jain S, 2023, DISASTER MED PUBLIC, V16, P2401, DOI 10.1017/dmp.2022.5
  21. Kundavaram APP, 2022, BMJ OPEN, V12, DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062724
  22. LaRotta J, 2023, INFECT DIS THER, V12, P389, DOI 10.1007/s40121-022-00748-z
  23. Lumlertgul N, 2022, ANN INTENSIVE CARE, V12, DOI 10.1186/s13613-022-01094-6
  24. Mallhi TH, 2022, FRONT MED-LAUSANNE, V9, DOI 10.3389/fmed.2022.973030
  25. Mathieu E, 2021, NAT HUM BEHAV, V5, P947, DOI 10.1038/s41562-021-01122-8
  26. Michelon CM, 2021, Rev Bras Anal Clin., V53, P109, DOI [10.21877/2448-3877.202100961,20210630.ilus, DOI 10.21877/2448-3877.202100961]
  27. Mollinedo-Gajate Irene, 2021, Crit Care Explor, V3, pe0346, DOI 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000346
  28. Mughal MS, 2021, J INVEST MED, V69, P1479, DOI 10.1136/jim-2021-001876
  29. Ng JH, 2021, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V77, P204, DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.09.002
  30. Paganini EP, 1996, AM J KIDNEY DIS, V28, pS81, DOI 10.1016/S0272-6386(96)90084-0
  31. Rewa OG, 2022, CURR OPIN CRIT CARE, V28, P613, DOI 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000999
  32. Freitas ARR, 2021, LANCET REG HEALTH-AM, V1, DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100021
  33. Ronco C, 2000, LANCET, V356, P26, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02430-2
  34. Roso-Llorach Albert, 2022, Glob Epidemiol, V4, P100071, DOI 10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100071
  35. Roushani J, 2022, CLIN KIDNEY J, V15, P507, DOI 10.1093/ckj/sfab237
  36. Saito S, 2021, J INFECTION, V82, P116, DOI 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.10.033
  37. Samaan F, 2022, PLOS ONE, V17, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0261958
  38. Shankar-Hari M, 2016, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V315, P775, DOI 10.1001/jama.2016.0289
  39. Simpson S, 2020, RADIOL-CARDIOTHORAC, V2, DOI [10.1148/ryct.2020200152, 10.1097/RTI.0000000000000524]
  40. Smith-Sreen J, 2022, EMERG INFECT DIS, V28, pS93, DOI 10.3201/eid2813.220228
  41. Soriano V, 2021, INT J INFECT DIS, V105, P374, DOI 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.02.115
  42. Stevens JS, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0244131
  43. Wang ZJ, 2021, NATURE, V592, P616, DOI [10.1038/s41586-021-03324-6, 10.1101/2021.01.15.426911]
  44. Zeiser FA, 2022, LANCET REG HEALTH-AM, V6, DOI 10.1016/j.lana.2021.100107