EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy for malignant biliary obstruction: A multicenter comparative study between plastic and metallic stents

Background and Objectives: EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) is commonly employed to address malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) after a failed ERCP. In this context, both self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs) and double-pigtail stents (DPSs) are suitable devices. However, few data comparing the outcomes of SEMS and DPS exist. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of SEMS and DPS at performing EUS-CDS. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study between March 2014 and March 2019. Patients diagnosed with MBO were considered eligible after at least one failed ERCP attempt. Clinical success was defined as a drop of direct bilirubin levels >= 50% at 7 and 30 postprocedural days. Adverse events (AEs) were categorized as early (<= 7 days) or late (> 7 days). The severity of AEs was graded as mild, moderate, or severe. Results: Forty patients were included, 24 in the SEMS group and 16 in the DPS group. Demographic data were similar between the groups. Technical success rates and clinical success rates at 7 and 30 days were similar between the groups. Similarly, we found no statistical difference in the incidence of early or late AEs. However, there were two severe AEs (intracavitary migration) in the DPS group and none in the SEMS cohort. Finally, there was no difference in median survival (DPS 117 days vs. SEMS 217 days; P = 0.99). Conclusion: EUS-guided CDS is an excellent alternative to achieve biliary drainage after a failed ERCP for MBO. There is no significant difference regarding the effectiveness and safety of SEMS and DPS in this context.

Palavras-chave

biliary drainage, EUS, endoscopic, jaundice, stent

URI

https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/57808

Referências

Adler DG, 2005, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V62, P1, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2005.04.015
Bang JY, 2018, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V88, P9, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2018.03.012
Cotton PB, 2010, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V71, P446, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.027
Artifon ELD, 2019, ENDOSC ULTRASOUND, V8, pS72, DOI 10.4103/eus.eus_62_19
Visconti TAD, 2018, ENDOSC INT OPEN, V6, pE914, DOI 10.1055/a-0626-7048
Dhindsa BS, 2020, ENDOSC ULTRASOUND, V9, P101, DOI 10.4103/eus.eus_80_19
Fujisawa T, 2014, BMC GASTROENTEROL, V14, DOI 10.1186/1471-230X-14-161
Guo JT, 2018, ENDOSC ULTRASOUND, V7, P356, DOI 10.4103/eus.eus_53_18
Gupta K, 2014, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V48, P80, DOI 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31828c6822
Hedjoudje A, 2019, UNITED EUR GASTROENT, V7, P60, DOI 10.1177/2050640618808147
Khashab MA, 2016, ENDOSC INT OPEN, V4, pE175, DOI 10.1055/s-0041-109083
Khashab MA, 2015, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V82, P993, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2015.06.043
KOYAMA K, 1981, AM J SURG, V142, P293, DOI 10.1016/0002-9610(81)90296-8
Krishnamoorthi R, 2020, SURG ENDOSC, V34, P2866, DOI 10.1007/s00464-020-07484-w
Logiudice FP, 2019, WORLD J GASTRO ENDOS, V11, P281, DOI 10.4253/wjge.v11.i4.281
Mohan BP, 2019, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V53, P243, DOI 10.1097/MCG.0000000000001167
Péus D, 2013, BMC MED INFORM DECIS, V13, DOI 10.1186/1472-6947-13-72
Salerno R, 2019, WORLD J GASTRO ENDOS, V11, P354, DOI 10.4253/wjge.v11.i5.354
Schmidt A, 2015, ENDOSCOPY, V47, P430, DOI 10.1055/s-0034-1391232
Tag CG, 2015, LAB ANIM-UK, V49, P70, DOI 10.1177/0023677214567748
Tarantino I, 2021, ENDOSC INT OPEN, V09, pE110, DOI 10.1055/a-1313-6850
Teoh AYB, 2018, GUT, V67, P1209, DOI 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314341
Wang KX, 2016, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V83, P1218, DOI 10.1016/j.gie.2015.10.033
Worku MG, 2020, PLOS ONE, V15, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0227135

Coleções

Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/MCG
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/ICHC
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HU
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/26
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/40
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/03

Página do item completo