Climate awareness, anxiety, and actions among youth: a qualitative study in a middle-income country

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ASSOC BRASILEIRA PSIQUIATRIA
Autores
THOMAS, Isaiah
MARTIN, Andres
BENOIT, Laelia
Citação
BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, v.45, n.3, p.258-267, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Objectives: The impact of climate change on mental health is well established, but few studies have examined the perspectives of young people, especially in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). In this qualitative study, we explored how Brazilian children and adolescents experience climate change. This approach can help inform environmental education, communication, and self-care strategies for this age group. Methods: We conducted focus groups with 50 children and adolescents aged 5 to 18 years in three locations in Brazil. We analyzed the data using an interpretative phenomenological analysis framework. Results: We identified three profiles of involvement with climate change: unaware, disengaged, and engaged. Profiles were largely related to different socioeconomic contexts. We analyzed each profile across the dimensions of space, time, emotions, and actions. Adults were portrayed by participants as stubborn deniers, as neutral influences, or as role models of knowledge and engagement. Due to their age and developmental level, young children had distinctive perceptions of climate change. Conclusion: Spatial and temporal perceptions of climate change are a key element for experiencing and engaging with environmental concerns and vary according to age and socioeconomic differences. Effective communication to foster climate action at individual and collective levels requires narratives that reach different ages. Replication of these findings in other LMICs is warranted.
Palavras-chave
Climate change, eco-anxiety, children, adolescents, social inequality
Referências
  1. Albrecht G, 2011, INT CULT PSYCHOL, P43, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-9742-5_3
  2. Allen M, 2013, MASS COMMUN SOC, V16, P661, DOI 10.1080/15205436.2013.770032
  3. Babakr Z.H., 2019, ED Q REV, V2, P517, DOI 10.31014/aior.1993.02.03.84
  4. Barford A, 2017, EMOT SPACE SOC, V22, P25, DOI 10.1016/j.emospa.2016.10.006
  5. Benoit L, 2022, CHILD ADOL MENT H-UK, V27, P47, DOI 10.1111/camh.12514
  6. Braat C, 2020, THESIS DELFT U TECHN
  7. Bretas V, 2017, EXAME INTERNET ESTAD
  8. BROADHURST PL, 1957, J EXP PSYCHOL, V54, P345, DOI 10.1037/h0049114
  9. Clayton S, 2021, CURR ENV HLTH REP, V8, P1, DOI 10.1007/s40572-020-00303-3
  10. Coalizao pelo Clima Sao Paulo, 2022, MEDIUM
  11. Collado S, 2017, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V54, P27, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.09.007
  12. Crandon TJ, 2022, NAT CLIM CHANGE, V12, P123, DOI 10.1038/s41558-021-01251-y
  13. Engward H, 2020, REFLECT PRACT, V21, P41, DOI 10.1080/14623943.2019.1708305
  14. Ferreira LA, 2022, DIA
  15. Fillipe M., 2021, EXAME
  16. Guo L, 2014, J GLOB CITIZSH EQUIT, V4, P1
  17. Hickman C, 2021, LANCET PLANET HEALTH, V5, pE863, DOI 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00278-3
  18. Householder AS, 1936, PRINCIPLES TOPOLOGIC, P231
  19. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2022, PAN CID IT
  20. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatistica, 2017, PAN EST BAH
  21. Kahan DM, 2011, J RISK RES, V14, P147, DOI 10.1080/13669877.2010.511246
  22. Kesselring T, 2011, NEW IDEAS PSYCHOL, V29, P327, DOI 10.1016/j.newideapsych.2010.03.008
  23. Kruger J, 1999, J PERS SOC PSYCHOL, V77, P1121, DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121
  24. Lourenco O, 1996, PSYCHOL REV, V103, P143
  25. Lund C, 2010, SOC SCI MED, V71, P517, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.04.027
  26. MAY R, 1989, CURRENT PSYCHOTHERAP, P363
  27. McDonald RI, 2015, J ENVIRON PSYCHOL, V44, P109, DOI 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.10.003
  28. Messas G, 2021, EXISTENTIAL STRUCTUR
  29. Milhorance F, 2021, NEW YORK TIMES
  30. Mtambanengwe F., 2012, African Crop Science Journal, V20, P227
  31. Pahl S, 2014, WIRES CLIM CHANGE, V5, P375, DOI 10.1002/wcc.272
  32. Piaget J, 1923, ARCH PSYCHOLOGIE, V18, P273
  33. REJESKI DW, 1982, J ENVIRON EDUC, V13, P27, DOI 10.1080/00958964.1982.9942653
  34. Schwartz SEO, 2022, CURR PSYCHOL, DOI 10.1007/s12144-022-02735-6
  35. Smith JA, 2015, BRIT J PAIN, V9, P41, DOI 10.1177/2049463714541642
  36. Souza Jacqueline Lopes de, 2015, Soc. nat., V27, P469, DOI 10.1590/1982-451320150308
  37. Stoknes P.E., 2015, WHAT WE THINK WE TRY
  38. Stoknes PE, 2014, ENERGY RES SOC SCI, V1, P161, DOI 10.1016/j.erss.2014.03.007
  39. Sustainable Development Solutions Network, 2021, SDSN NETW ACT REP
  40. Thompson R, 2022, CHILD ADOL MENT H-UK, V27, P4, DOI 10.1111/camh.12520
  41. Tong A, 2007, INT J QUAL HEALTH C, V19, P349, DOI 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042
  42. United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), 2022, HIST CTR SALV BAH
  43. Vins H, 2015, INT J ENV RES PUB HE, V12, P13251, DOI 10.3390/ijerph121013251
  44. WHO, 2022, MENT HLTH CLIM CHANG
  45. World Health Organization (WHO), 2021, CHECKL ASS VULN HLTH
  46. Zembylas M, 2012, BRIT EDUC RES J, V38, P41, DOI 10.1080/01411926.2010.523779