Responsiveness of the international spinal cord injury quality of life basic data set V2.0: An international longitudinal study

Carregando...
Imagem de Miniatura
Citações na Scopus
2
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Autores
POST, Marcel W. M.
FORCHHEIMER, Martin
CHARLIFUE, Susan
NEW, Peter
TATE, Denise G.
Citação
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, v.46, n.5, p.760-768, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Context/ObjectiveExamine the sensitivity of the International Spinal Cord Injury Quality of Life Basic Data Set V2.0 (QoL-BDS V2.0) to reflect changes in mobility and secondary health conditions (SHCs) between inpatient rehabilitation and one-year follow-up.DesignInternational longitudinal study. Questionnaires were administered at baseline (Median 6 weeks, inter-quartile range 4-10 weeks post-onset) and after 12 months.SettingSpinal cord rehabilitation institutions in the US, Brazil, Australia and the Netherlands.Participants: Individuals with recent onset of spinal cord injury or disease (SCI/SCD) admitted to inpatient rehabilitation.Outcome measuresThe QoL-BDS V2.0, comprises four items on satisfaction with 'life as a whole', 'physical health', 'psychological health', and 'social life'. Mobility level was measured with a single item and SHCs with the SCI Secondary Conditions Scale (SCI-SCS).ResultsOf the 160 participants, 61% had SCI, 48% had tetraplegia and 82% were wheelchair-users. Scores on 'life as a whole', 'physical health' and the total scale were significantly higher at follow-up compared to baseline in the total sample and the SCD subgroup, but not in the SCI subgroup. Increases in 'physical health', 'psychological health', 'social life' and the total score were significantly associated with improvements in the SCI-SCS or mobility scores. Participants with improved SCI-SCS and mobility at follow-up showed significantly more improvement in satisfaction with social life and the total score compared to participants without such favorable changes.ConclusionThe results of this study provide partial evidence of responsiveness of the QoL-BDS V2.0 total score as a measure of QoL among individuals with SCI/SCD.
Palavras-chave
Spinal cord injuries, Quality of life, Validation studies, Rehabilitation, Adaptation
Referências
  1. Adriaansen JJE, 2016, J REHABIL MED, V48, P853, DOI 10.2340/16501977-2166
  2. Arora M, 2016, SPINAL CORD, V54, P402, DOI 10.1038/sc.2015.119
  3. Biering-Sorensen F, 2011, SPINAL CORD, V49, P357, DOI 10.1038/sc.2010.153
  4. Bonanno GA, 2012, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V57, P236, DOI 10.1037/a0029256
  5. Charlifue S, 2012, SPINAL CORD, V50, P672, DOI 10.1038/sc.2012.27
  6. Craig A, 2019, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V100, P441, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.07.442
  7. Engel L, 2018, SOC SCI MED, V213, P154, DOI 10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.041
  8. Halvorsen A, 2019, SPINAL CORD, V57, P324, DOI 10.1038/s41393-018-0223-7
  9. Jensen MP, 2013, SPINAL CORD, V51, P882, DOI 10.1038/sc.2013.112
  10. Jörgensen S, 2017, PM&R, V9, P356, DOI 10.1016/j.pmrj.2016.09.004
  11. Kalpakjian CZ, 2007, J SPINAL CORD MED, V30, P131, DOI 10.1080/10790268.2007.11753924
  12. Kunz S, 2022, QUAL LIFE RES, V31, P1247, DOI 10.1007/s11136-021-03027-5
  13. Larsen CM, 2021, SPINAL CORD, V59, P821, DOI 10.1038/s41393-020-00594-1
  14. Liang MH, 2000, MED CARE, V38, P84, DOI 10.1097/00005650-200009002-00013
  15. Mortenson WB, 2010, SPINAL CORD, V48, P73, DOI 10.1038/sc.2009.92
  16. New PW, 2019, SPINAL CORD, V57, P789, DOI 10.1038/s41393-019-0273-5
  17. New PW, 2017, TOP SPINAL CORD INJ, V23, P299, DOI 10.1310/sci2304-299
  18. Oyakawa A., 2013, ABSTR BOOK 52 ANN M
  19. Pattanakuhar S, 2020, SPINAL CORD, V58, P1015, DOI 10.1038/s41393-020-0468-9
  20. Post MWM, 2016, SPINAL CORD, V54, P314, DOI 10.1038/sc.2015.99
  21. Post MWM, 2019, SPINAL CORD, V57, P992, DOI 10.1038/s41393-019-0302-4
  22. Post MWM., SPINAL CORD
  23. Revicki Dennis A, 2006, Health Qual Life Outcomes, V4, P70
  24. Riggins MS, 2011, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V92, P1027, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.02.010
  25. Rohn EJ, 2022, SPINAL CORD, V60, P177, DOI 10.1038/s41393-021-00742-1
  26. Schwartz CE, 2018, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V99, P1599, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.01.028
  27. Scivoletto G, 2011, SPINAL CORD, V49, P391, DOI 10.1038/sc.2010.85
  28. Szabo S, 1996, QUALITY LIFE PHARMAC, P355
  29. van Koppenhagen CF, 2008, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V89, P1733, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.12.042
  30. van Leeuwen CM, 2011, ARCH PHYS MED REHAB, V92, P207, DOI 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.10.011