Review of strategies to investigate low sample return rates in remote tobacco trials: A call to action for more user-centered design research

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Dimensions
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
ELSEVIER INC.
Autores
VILARDAGA, R.
THRUL, J.
DEVITO, A.
KENDZOR, D. E.
SABO, P.
Citação
ADDICTION NEUROSCIENCE, v.7, article ID 100090, p, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Remote collection of biomarkers of tobacco use in clinical trials poses significant challenges. A recent meta-analysis and scoping review of the smoking cessation literature indicated that sample return rates are low and that new methods are needed to investigate the underlying causes of these low rates. In this paper we conducted a narrative review and heuristic analysis of the different human factors approaches reported to evaluate and/or improve sample return rates among 31 smoking cessation studies recently identified in the literature. We created a heuristic metric (with scores from 0 to 4) to evaluate the level of elaboration or complexity of the user-centered design strategy reported by researchers. Our review of the literature identified five types of challenges typically encountered by researchers (in that order): usability and procedural, technical (device related), sample contamination (e.g., polytobacco), psychosocial factors (e.g., digital divide), and motivational factors. Our review of strategies indicated that 35% of the studies employed user-centered design methods with the remaining studies relying on informal methods. Among the studies that employed user-centered design methods, only 6% reached a level of 3 in our user-centered design heuristic metric. None of the studies reached the highest level of complexity (i.e., 4). This review examined these findings in the context of the larger literature, discussed the need to address the role of health equity factors more directly, and concluded with a call to action to increase the application and reporting of user-centered design strategies in biomarkers research.
Palavras-chave
Biochemical verification, Biomarkers, Clinical trials, Health equity, Remote studies, Sample return rates, Smoking cessation, User-centered design
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/58662
Referências
  1. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework, Clin. Pharmacol. Ther., 69, 3, pp. 89-95, (2001)
  2. Benowitz N.L., Bernert J.T., Foulds J., Et al., Biochemical verification of tobacco use and abstinence: 2019 update, Nicotine Tob. Res., 22, 7, pp. 1086-1097, (2020)
  3. Glasgow R.E., Mullooly J.P., Vogt T.M., Et al., Biochemical validation of smoking status: pros, cons, and data from four low-intensity intervention trials, Addict. Behav., 18, 5, pp. 511-527, (1993)
  4. Patrick D.L., Cheadle A., Thompson D.C., Diehr P., Koepsell T., Kinne S., The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis, Am. J. Public Health, 84, 7, pp. 1086-1093, (1994)
  5. Velicer W.F., Prochaska J.O., Rossi J.S., Snow M.G., Assessing outcome in smoking cessation studies, Psychol. Bull., 111, 1, pp. 23-41, (1992)
  6. Thrul J., Howe C.L., Devkota J., Alexander A., Allen A.M., Businelle M.S., Hebert E.T., Heffner J.L., Kendzor D.E., Ra C.K., Gordon J.S.
  7. National Institutes of Health (NIH), (2023)
  8. Albert W., Tullis T., Measuring the user experience, Second Edition: Collecting, Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics, (2013)
  9. Valencia S., Callinan L., Shic F., Smith M., Evaluation of the momba live long remote smoking detection system during and after pregnancy: development and usability study, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 8, 11, (2020)
  10. Dallery J., Meredith S., Jarvis B., Nuzzo P.A., Internet-based group contingency management to promote smoking abstinence, Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol., 23, 3, pp. 176-183, (2015)
  11. Kendzor D.E., Businelle M.S., Waring J.J.C., Et al., Automated mobile delivery of financial incentives for smoking cessation among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults: feasibility study, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 8, 4, (2020)
  12. Medenblik A.M., Calhoun P.S., Maisto S.A., Et al., Pilot cohorts for development of concurrent mobile treatment for alcohol and tobacco use disorders, Subst. Abuse, 15, (2021)
  13. Bloom E.L., Japuntich S.J., Pierro A., Dallery J., Leahey T.M., Rosen J., Pilot trial of QuitBet: a digital social game that pays you to stop smoking, Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol., 30, 5, pp. 642-652, (2022)
  14. Kong G., Goldberg A., Dallery J., Krishnan-Sarin S., An open-label pilot study of an intervention using mobile phones to deliver contingency management of tobacco abstinence to high school students, Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol., 25, 5, pp. 333-337, (2017)
  15. Herbec A., Brown J., Shahab L., West R., Lessons learned from unsuccessful use of personal carbon monoxide monitors to remotely assess abstinence in a pragmatic trial of a smartphone stop smoking app—a secondary analysis, Addict. Behav. Rep., 9, (2019)
  16. Dopp A.R., Parisi K.E., Munson S.A., Lyon A.R., A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts, Transl. Behav. Med., 9, 6, pp. 1057-1064, (2019)
  17. (2022)
  18. Manta C., Jain S.S., Coravos A., Mendelsohn D., Izmailova E.S., An evaluation of biometric monitoring technologies for vital signs in the era of COVID-19, Clin. Transl. Sci., 13, 6, pp. 1034-1044, (2020)
  19. Curry S.J., McBride C., Grothaus L.C., Louie D., Wagner E.H., A randomized trial of self-help materials, personalized feedback, and telephone counseling with nonvolunteer smokers, J. Consult. Clin. Psychol., 63, 6, pp. 1005-1014, (1995)
  20. Mohr D.C., Cuijpers P., Lehman K., Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions, J. Med. Internet Res., 13, 1, (2011)
  21. May R., Walker F., de B.S., Bartrop R., Tofler G.H., Pilot study of an internet-based, simulated teachable moment for smoking cessation, J. Smok. Cessat., 14, 3, pp. 139-148, (2019)
  22. Dahne J., Tomko R.L., McClure E.A., Obeid J.S., Carpenter M.J., Remote methods for conducting tobacco-focused clinical trials, Nicotine Tob. Res., 22, 12, pp. 2134-2140, (2020)
  23. Garg R., McQueen A., Wolff J., Et al., Comparing two approaches to remote biochemical verification of self-reported cessation in very low-income smokers, Addict. Behav. Rep., 13, (2021)
  24. Devine E.G., Waters M.E., Putnam M., Et al., Concealment and fabrication by experienced research subjects, Clin. Trials, 10, 6, pp. 935-948, (2013)
  25. Kramer J., Rubin A., Coster W., Et al., Strategies to address participant misrepresentation for eligibility in Web-based research, Int. J. Methods Psychiatr. Res., 23, 1, pp. 120-129, (2014)
  26. Teitcher J.E.F., Bockting W.O., Bauermeister J.A., Hoefer C.J., Miner M.H., Klitzman R.L., Detecting, preventing, and responding to “fraudsters” in internet research: ethics and tradeoffs, J. Law Med. Ethics, 43, 1, pp. 116-133, (2015)
  27. Heffner J.L., Watson N.L., Dahne J., Et al., Recognizing and preventing participant deception in online nicotine and tobacco research studies: suggested tactics and a call to action, Nicotine Tob. Res., 23, 10, pp. 1810-1812, (2021)
  28. LePine S.E., Peasley-Miklus C., Farrington M.L., Young W.J.
  29. (2022)
  30. Moggridge B., Designing Interactions. 1 Edition, (2007)
  31. Human-Centred Design Processes For Interactive Systems, (2017)
  32. Rubin J., Chisnell D., Spool J., Handbook of Usability Testing: How to Plan, Design, and Conduct Effective Tests, (2008)
  33. Czajkowski S.M., Powell L.H., Adler N., Et al., From ideas to efficacy: the orbit model for developing behavioral treatments for chronic diseases, Health Psychol., 34, 10, pp. 971-982, (2015)
  34. Czajkowski S.M., Hunter C.M., From ideas to interventions: a review and comparison of frameworks used in early phase behavioral translation research, Health Psychol., 40, 12, pp. 829-844, (2021)
  35. Onken L.S., Carroll K.M., Shoham V., Cuthbert B.N., Riddle M., Reenvisioning clinical science: unifying the discipline to improve the public health, Clin. Psychol. Sci., 2, 1, pp. 22-34, (2014)
  36. Harte R., Glynn L., Rodriguez-Molinero A., Et al., A human-centered design methodology to enhance the usability, human factors, and user experience of connected health systems: a three-phase methodology, JMIR Hum. Factors, 4, 1, (2017)
  37. Hooper D., User-Centered Design For Medical Devices: If It Isn't Documented It Doesn't Exist, (2012)
  38. McWilliams E.C., Barbey F.M., Dyer J.F., Et al., Feasibility of repeated assessment of cognitive function in older adults using a wireless, mobile, dry-eeg headset and tablet-based games, Front. Psychiatry, 12, (2021)
  39. Biondi A., Laiou P., Bruno E., Et al., Remote and long-term self-monitoring of electroencephalographic and noninvasive measurable variables at home in patients with epilepsy (EEG@HOME): protocol for an observational study, JMIR Res. Protoc., 10, 3, (2021)
  40. Godfrey A., Vandendriessche B., Bakker J.P., Et al., Fit-for-purpose biometric monitoring technologies: leveraging the laboratory biomarker experience, Clin. Transl. Sci., 14, 1, pp. 62-74, (2021)
  41. Center For Mental Health Services (US), (2001)
  42. Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System For the 21st Century, (2001)
  43. (2003)
  44. (2020)
  45. Demographics of Mobile Device Ownership and Adoption in the United States, (2020)
  46. Perrin A., Turner E., Smartphones Help Blacks, Hispanics Bridge Some – But Not All – Digital Gaps With Whites, (2019)
  47. Comstock J., With Many Regulatory Barriers Clear, Remaining Roadblocks For Digital Therapeutics Are Cultural, Logistical, (2020)
  48. Spanakis P., Peckham E., Mathers A., Shiers D., Gilbody S.
  49. Benda N.C., Veinot T.C., Sieck C.J., Ancker J.S., Broadband internet access is a social determinant of health!, Am. J. Public Health, 110, 8, pp. 1123-1125, (2020)
  50. Boyle R.G., Sharma E., Lauten K., D'Silva J., St Claire A.W., Examining use and dual use of tobacco products and marijuana among minnesota adults, Subst. Use Misuse, 56, 11, pp. 1586-1592, (2021)
  51. Ashford R.D., Brown A.M., Curtis B.
  52. Goergen C.J., Tweardy M.J., Steinhubl S.R., Et al., Detection and monitoring of viral infections via wearable devices and biometric data, Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng., 24, pp. 1-27, (2022)
  53. Glasgow R.E., Askew S., Purcell P., Et al., Use of RE-AIM to address health inequities: application in a low-income community health center-based weight loss and hypertension self-management program, Transl. Behav. Med., 3, 2, pp. 200-210, (2013)
  54. Williams K., Markwardt S., Kearney S.M., Et al., Addressing implementation challenges to digital care delivery for adults with multiple chronic conditions: stakeholder feedback in a randomized controlled trial, JMIR Mhealth Uhealth, 9, 2, (2021)
  55. Tamura K., Vijayakumar N.P., Troendle J.F., Et al., Multilevel mobile health approach to improve cardiovascular health in resource-limited communities with Step It Up: a randomised controlled trial protocol targeting physical activity, BMJ Open, 10, 12, (2020)
  56. Dopp A.R., Parisi K.E., Munson S.A., Lyon A.R., Integrating implementation and user-centred design strategies to enhance the impact of health services: protocol from a concept mapping study, Health Res. Policy Syst., 17, (2019)
  57. Abdelazeem B., Hamdallah A., Rizk M.A., Et al., Does usage of monetary incentive impact the involvement in surveys? A systematic review and meta-analysis of 46 randomized controlled trials, PLoS One, 18, 1, (2023)
  58. Lynn P., Evaluating push-to-web methodology for mixed-mode surveys using address-based samples, Surv. Res. Methods, 14, 1, pp. 19-30, (2020)
  59. Adams J., Parkinson L., Sanson-Fisher R.W., Walsh R.A., Enhancing self-report of adolescent smoking: the effects of bogus pipeline and anonymity, Addict. Behav., 33, 10, pp. 1291-1296, (2008)
  60. Etter J.F., Neidhart E., Bertrand S., Malafosse A., Bertrand D., Collecting saliva by mail for genetic and cotinine analyses in participants recruited through the Internet, Eur. J. Epidemiol., 20, 10, pp. 833-838, (2005)
  61. Hennrikus D.J., Lando H.A., McCarty M.C., Et al., The TEAM project: the effectiveness of smoking cessation intervention with hospital patients, Prev. Med., 40, 3, pp. 249-258, (2005)
  62. Fix B.V., O'Connor R., Hammond D., Et al., ITC “spit and butts” pilot study: the feasibility of collecting saliva and cigarette butt samples from smokers to evaluate policy, Nicotine Tob. Res., 12, 3, pp. 185-190, (2010)
  63. Duffy S.A., Ronis D.L., Karvonen-Gutierrez C.A., Et al., Effectiveness of the tobacco tactics program in the trinity health system, Am. J. Prev. Med., 51, 4, pp. 551-565, (2016)
  64. McClure E.A., Tomko R.L., Carpenter M.J., Treiber F.A., Gray K.M., Acceptability and compliance with a remote monitoring system to track smoking and abstinence among young smokers, Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse, 44, 5, pp. 561-570, (2018)
  65. Gryaznov D., Chammartin F., Stoeckle M., Et al., Smartphone app and carbon monoxide self-monitoring support for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial nested into the Swiss HIV cohort study, J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr., 85, 1, pp. e8-e11, (2020)
  66. Vogel E.A., Ramo D.E., Meacham M.C., Prochaska J.J., Delucchi K.L., Humfleet G.L., The Put It Out Project (POP) Facebook intervention for young sexual and gender minority smokers: outcomes of a pilot, randomized, controlled trial, Nicotine Tob. Res., 22, 9, pp. 1614-1621, (2020)
  67. Schwaninger P., Berli C., Scholz U., Luscher J., Effectiveness of a dyadic buddy app for smoking cessation: randomized controlled trial, J. Med. Internet Res., 23, 9, (2021)
  68. Joyce C.M., Saulsgiver K., Mohanty S., Et al., Remote patient monitoring and incentives to support smoking cessation among pregnant and postpartum medicaid members: three randomized controlled pilot studies, JMIR Form Res., 5, 9, (2021)
  69. Meacham M.C., Ramo D.E., Prochaska J.J., Et al., A Facebook intervention to address cigarette smoking and heavy episodic drinking: a pilot randomized controlled trial, J. Subst. Abuse Treat., 122, (2021)
  70. Dallery J., Cassidy R.N., Raiff B.R., Single-case experimental designs to evaluate novel technology-based health interventions, J. Med. Internet Res., 15, 2, (2013)
  71. Tan N.C., Mohtar Z.B.M., Koh E.Y.L., Et al., An exhaled carbon monoxide self-monitoring device linked to social media to support smoking cessation: a proof of concept pilot study, Proc. Singap. Healthc., 27, 3, pp. 187-192, (2018)
  72. Nomura A., Tanigawa T., Muto T., Et al., Clinical efficacy of telemedicine compared to face-to-face clinic visits for smoking cessation: multicenter open-label randomized controlled noninferiority trial, J. Med. Internet Res., 21, 4, (2019)
  73. Vogel E.A., Belohlavek A., Prochaska J.J., Ramo D.E., Development and acceptability testing of a Facebook smoking cessation intervention for sexual and gender minority young adults, Internet Interv., 15, pp. 87-92, (2019)
  74. Aveyard P., Griffin C., Lawrence T., Cheng K.K., A controlled trial of an expert system and self-help manual intervention based on the stages of change versus standard self-help materials in smoking cessation, Addiction, 98, 3, pp. 345-354, (2003)
  75. Cha S., Ganz O., Cohn A.M., Ehlke S.J., Graham A.L., Feasibility of biochemical verification in a web-based smoking cessation study, Addict. Behav., 73, pp. 204-208, (2017)
  76. Reynolds B., Harris M., Slone S.A., Et al., A feasibility study of home-based contingency management with adolescent smokers of rural appalachia, Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol., 23, 6, pp. 486-493, (2015)
  77. Garrison K.A., Pal P., O'Malley S.S., Et al., Craving to quit: a randomized controlled trial of smartphone app-based mindfulness training for smoking cessation, Nicotine Tob. Res., 22, 3, pp. 324-331, (2020)
  78. Cunningham J.A., Kushnir V., Selby P., Tyndale R.F., Zawertailo L., Leatherdale S.T., Effect of mailing nicotine patches on tobacco cessation among adult smokers: a randomized clinical trial, JAMA Intern. Med., 176, 2, pp. 184-190, (2016)
  79. Ferketich A.K., Pennell M., Seiber E.E., Et al., Provider-delivered tobacco dependence treatment to medicaid smokers, Nicotine Tob. Res., 16, 6, pp. 786-793, (2014)
  80. Stoops W.W., Dallery J., Fields N.M., Et al., An internet-based abstinence reinforcement smoking cessation intervention in rural smokers, Drug Alcohol Depend., 105, 1-2, pp. 56-62, (2009)
  81. Simon J.A., Solkowitz S.N., Carmody T.P., Browner W.S., Smoking cessation after surgery. A randomized trial, Arch. Intern. Med., 157, 12, pp. 1371-1376, (1997)

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - FM/Outros
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - LIM/21
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/09
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - ODS/10