Histological Compatibility in Distal Neurotizations: A Systematic Review

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
0
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Dimensions
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
Autores
NAKAMOTO, Joao Carlos
SORRENTI, Luiz
WATAYA, Erick Yoshio
Citação
INDIAN JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, v.56, n.5, p.405-412, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Considering the importance of defining the minimum number of axons between recipient and donor branches, that is, the definition of histological compatibility in distal neurotizations for the success of the procedure and the surgeon's freedom to choose individualized strategies for each patient, this systematic review was conducted to find out the most recent studies on the subject. The objective of this systematic review was to determine the importance of the number of axons and the relationship between axon counts in the donor and recipient nerves in the success of nerve transfer. A literature review was performed on five international databases: Web of Science, Scopus, Wiley (Cochrane Database), Embase, and PubMed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed (2020 version), a guide designed to guide the elaboration of systematic literature reviews. One hundred and fifty-seven studies were found, and 23 were selected based on the eligibility criteria. The articles presented were conclusive in determining the importance of the number of axons in the success of nerve transfer. Still, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor and recipient nerves seems more relevant in the success of transfers and is not always explored by the authors. The review of the articles has provided compelling evidence that the number of axons is a critical determinant of the success of nerve transfer procedures. However, the relationship between the number of axons in the donor nerve and that in the recipient nerve appears to be even more crucial for successful transfers, a factor that is not always adequately explored by authors in the existing literature.
Palavras-chave
axon count, nerve transfer, systematic review, donor and recipient nerve.
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/59233
Referências
  1. Ackley B.J., 2007, Evidence-based nursing care guidelines: Medical-surgical interventions
  2. Cheah A, 2019, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V144, p1044e, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006200
  3. Colonna MR, 2019, MICROSURG, V39, P434, DOI 10.1002/micr.30402
  4. Costa AL, 2021, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V74, P2731, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.03.064
  5. Domeshek LF, 2019, EYE, V33, P398, DOI 10.1038/s41433-018-0222-0
  6. Frank K, 2019, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V72, P751, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2018.12.017
  7. Gang Y, 2014, CLIN ANAT, V27, P783, DOI 10.1002/ca.22327
  8. Hong GH, 2019, NEURAL REGEN RES, V14, P1449, DOI 10.4103/1673-5374.253530
  9. Jiang BG, 2007, EUR NEUROL, V58, P12, DOI 10.1159/000102161
  10. Kara M, 2022, J PLAST RECONSTR AES, V75, P773, DOI 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.09.049
  11. Kehrer A, 2018, CLIN HEMORHEOL MICRO, V70, P1, DOI 10.3233/CH-189905
  12. Khair M Michael, 2016, J Hand Surg Am, V41, pe405, DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2016.07.110
  13. Lin HD, 2013, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V29, P325, DOI 10.1055/s-0033-1343498
  14. Luo TD, 2018, CLIN ANAT, V31, P1006, DOI 10.1002/ca.23255
  15. Mahmood B, 2020, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V36, P311, DOI 10.1055/s-0039-1701036
  16. Melamed E, 2022, MICROSURG, V42, P352, DOI 10.1002/micr.30877
  17. Mohan AT, 2021, J RECONSTR MICROSURG, V37, P136, DOI 10.1055/s-0040-1715878
  18. Namazi H, 2017, ORTHOP TRAUMATOL-SUR, V103, P509, DOI 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.01.014
  19. Namazi H, 2017, J SURG RES, V211, P95, DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2016.12.003
  20. Page MJ, 2021, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V372, DOI [10.1136/bmj.n71, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.03.001, 10.1136/bmj.n160, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105906, 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4, 10.26633/RPSP.2022.112, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003]
  21. Pruksakorn D, 2007, CLIN ANAT, V20, P140, DOI 10.1002/ca.20376
  22. Saltzman EB, 2021, J HAND SURG-AM, V46, DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.11.022
  23. Sananpanich K, 2018, J HAND SURG-AM, V43, P920, DOI 10.1016/j.jhsa.2018.07.013
  24. Schenck TL, 2016, BRAIN BEHAV, V6, DOI 10.1002/brb3.578
  25. Schreiber JJ, 2015, PLAST RECONSTR SURG, V135, p135E, DOI 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000795
  26. Yan JG, 2017, J NEUROSCI RES, V95, P2493, DOI 10.1002/jnr.24074

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT