Intracranial Pressure Monitoring in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Cohort Study with Paired Analysis

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
Citação
BRAZILIAN NEUROSURGERY-ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE NEUROCIRURGIA, v.42, n.4, p.E277-E281, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Introduction Intracranial hypertension continues to be the most frequent cause of death in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Thus, invasive monitoring of intracranial pressure (ICP) is a very important tool in neurointensivism. However, there is controversy regarding ICP monitoring and prognosis.Objectives To evaluate whether there is a difference in mortality between patients with severe TBI who underwent invasive ICP monitoring compared with those who did not undergo such procedure.Methodology This is a unicentric study in the prospective cohort mode. A total of 316 patients with severe TBI were evaluated and, out of these 316 individuals, 35 were submitted to ICP monitoring. All clinical data were evaluated by the Tertiary Hospital Neurosurgery team in the city of Sao Paulo.Results Of the total cohort, 35 (11%) patients underwent ICP monitoring, while 281 did not. Comparing the 2 groups, there was no difference in terms of early mortality between patients who were submitted to monitoring and those who were not (34.3 versus 14.3%; p = 0.09); there was also no difference in terms of hospital mortality (40 versus 28.5%; p = 0.31) or intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (16.10 days, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 10.6-21.6; versus 20.60 days, 95%CI: 13.50-27.70; p = 0.31).Conclusions In this cohort, we did not identify differences in mortality or in duration of hospitalization between patients with ICP monitoring and those exclusively with clinical-radiological evaluation. However, further national co-operative studies of services using ICP monitoring are needed to achieve results with greater generalization power.
Palavras-chave
intracranial pressure, hospital mortality, intracranial hypertension, brain injuries, traumatic, pressao intracraniana, mortalidade hospitalar, hipertensao intracraniana, lesoes encefalicas, traumaticas
Referências
  1. Agrawal D, 2016, J NEUROTRAUM, V33, P853, DOI 10.1089/neu.2015.4015
  2. Arnold DMJ, 2019, ANN PLAS SURG, V82, P420, DOI 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001796
  3. Barros M, 2011, MONTENEGRO NJAMPPRIN, P1051
  4. Brain Trauma Foundation, 2007, J Neurotrauma, V24 Suppl 1, pS37
  5. Brain Trauma Foundation American Association of Neurological Surgeons Congresso of Neurlogical Surgeons, 2016, GUIDELINES MANAGEMEN
  6. Chesnut RM, 2012, NEW ENGL J MED, V367, P2471, DOI 10.1056/NEJMoa1207363
  7. Dawes AJ, 2015, J TRAUMA ACUTE CARE, V78, P492, DOI 10.1097/TA.0000000000000559
  8. de Andrade AF, 2015, BRAZ NEUROSURG, V34, P40, DOI 10.1055/s-0035-1547378
  9. de Medinaceli L F., 1994, CELL SURG REPAIR DIV
  10. Ferreira Cesar Biselli, 2015, Rev Bras Ter Intensiva, V27, P315, DOI 10.5935/0103-507X.20150055
  11. MacLaughlin BW, 2015, AM J SURG, V210, P1082, DOI 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.08.007
  12. Marinescu SA, 2014, ROM J MORPHOL EMBRYO, V55, P891
  13. Mohammadi R, 2012, HOMEOPATHY, V101, P141, DOI 10.1016/j.homp.2012.05.002
  14. Neumeister MW, 2020, CLIN PLAST SURG, V47, P279, DOI 10.1016/j.cps.2019.12.008
  15. Prado RR, 2015, APOSTILA ILUSTRADA C, P1
  16. Su SH, 2014, PLOS ONE, V9, DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0087432
  17. Wang WJ, 2018, ANAT REC, V301, P1690, DOI 10.1002/ar.23921
  18. Weller WJ, 2019, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V50, P87, DOI 10.1016/j.ocl.2018.08.011
  19. Wu RB, 2016, NEUROL RES, V38, P461, DOI 10.1080/01616412.2016.1181346
  20. Yuan Q, 2016, NEUROSURGERY, V78, P361, DOI 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001050
  21. Yuan Q, 2015, J NEUROSURG, V122, P574, DOI 10.3171/2014.10.JNS1460