Does metatarsus primus elevatus really exist in hallux rigidus? A weightbearing CT case-control study

Nenhuma Miniatura disponível
Citações na Scopus
6
Tipo de produção
article
Data de publicação
2023
DOI
Scopus
Web of Science
PubMed
Dimensions
Título da Revista
ISSN da Revista
Título do Volume
Editora
SPRINGER
Autores
LEE, Hee Young
MANSUR, Nacime S.
LALEVEE, Matthieu
MALY, Connor
IEHL, Caleb J.
HEMBREE, Walter C.
NETTO, Cesar de Cesar
Citação
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, v.143, n.2, p.755-761, 2023
Projetos de Pesquisa
Unidades Organizacionais
Fascículo
Resumo
Background Elevated first metatarsal, Metatarsus primus elevatus (MPE), has been a topic of controversy. Recent studies have supported a significantly elevated first metatarsal in hallux rigidus on weight-bearing radiographs (WBR). However, conventional radiographs have limitations for accurate measurement. Our objective was to comparatively assess MPE and other variables which can affect the spatial relationship of the forefoot in the HR group compared to controls using weight-bearing CT (WBCT). Methods In this single-center, retrospective, case-control study, 25 patients (30 feet) with symptomatic HR and 30 controls were selected. WBCT parameters were measured by two independent investigators. Inter-observer reliabilities were assessed using intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs). MPE was evaluated by measuring the direct distance between 1st and 2nd metatarsals. Independent t tests were performed to compare the two groups. A threshold of MPE to diagnose HR was calculated using the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Results HR groups had increased hallux valgus angle (HVA) (8.52 degrees in control vs 11.98 degrees in HR) and MPE (2.92 vs 5.09 mm), decreased 1st metatarsal declination angle (21.09 degrees vs 19.07 degrees) 1st/2nd metatarsal declination ratio (87.45 vs 79.71) indicating elevated first metatarsal compared to controls. Dorsal translation of the first metatarsal at the first tarsometatarsal joint was observed in 21 (70%) patients of the HR group when defined as a step-off or discontinuation of the curvature along the first TMT joint. The threshold of MPE for diagnosis of HR was 4.19 mm with 77% sensitivity and 77% specificity. Conclusion Our results confirmed a significantly elevated first metatarsal in the HR group compared to controls on WBCT. A MPE greater than 4.19 mm was found to be diagnostic for symptomatic HR. Significant number of patients in the HR group (70%) had dorsal translation of the first metatarsal at the first TMT joint which can contribute to increased MPE.
Palavras-chave
Hallux rigidus, Metatarsus primus elevatus, MPE, Metatarsal declination angle, Weight-bearing CT, WBCT
URI
https://observatorio.fm.usp.br/handle/OPI/59227
Referências
  1. Bouaicha S, 2010, FOOT ANKLE INT, V31, P807, DOI 10.3113/FAI.2010.0807
  2. Brandenburg LS, 2021, ARCH ORTHOPAEDIC TRA, V22, P1
  3. Bryant A, 2000, J Foot Ankle Surg, V39, P39
  4. Ceccarini P, 2015, FOOT ANKLE INT, V36, P1469, DOI 10.1177/1071100715595503
  5. Cheung ZB, 2018, FOOT ANKLE INT, V39, P67, DOI 10.1177/1071100717732549
  6. Cho BK, 2017, FOOT ANKLE INT, V38, P541, DOI 10.1177/1071100716688177
  7. Coughlin MJ, 2003, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V85A, P2072, DOI 10.2106/00004623-200311000-00003
  8. Coughlin MJ, 2003, FOOT ANKLE INT, V24, P731, DOI 10.1177/107110070302401002
  9. ENGEL E, 1983, J AM POD ASSOC, V73, P620, DOI 10.7547/87507315-73-12-620
  10. Geng X, 2015, J ORTHOP SURG RES, V10, DOI 10.1186/s13018-015-0289-2
  11. Horton GA, 1999, FOOT ANKLE INT, V20, P777, DOI 10.1177/107110079902001204
  12. Jones Mackenzie T, 2019, Foot Ankle Orthop, V4, p2473011419875686, DOI 10.1177/2473011419875686
  13. Kim Y, 2015, FOOT ANKLE INT, V36, P944, DOI 10.1177/1071100715576994
  14. Koo TK, 2016, J CHIROPR MED, V15, P155, DOI 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012
  15. Lambrinudi C, 1938, Proc R Soc Med, V31, P1273
  16. Lintz F, 2017, FOOT ANKLE INT, V38, P684, DOI 10.1177/1071100717690806
  17. Lundeen R O, 2000, J Foot Ankle Surg, V39, P161
  18. Mahmoud K, 2021, FOOT ANKLE INT, V42, P287, DOI 10.1177/1071100720962398
  19. Malerba F, 2008, FOOT ANKLE INT, V29, P677, DOI 10.3113/FAI.2008.0677
  20. MEYER J O, 1987, Journal of Foot Surgery, V26, P237
  21. Netto CD, 2020, FOOT ANKLE CLIN, V25, P31, DOI 10.1016/j.fcl.2019.10.001
  22. Richter M, 2014, FOOT ANKLE SURG, V20, P201, DOI 10.1016/j.fas.2014.04.004
  23. Rojas EO., 2021, ARCH ORTHOPAEDIC TRA, P1
  24. Ronconi P, 2000, J Foot Ankle Surg, V39, P154
  25. Roukis TS, 2005, J AM PODIAT MED ASSN, V95, P221, DOI 10.7547/0950221
  26. Saltzman, 2021, Foot Ankle Int., Patent No. 1071100721997149
  27. Sripanich Y, 2021, ARCH ORTHOP TRAUM SU, V141, P775, DOI 10.1007/s00402-020-03477-5
  28. Steadman J, 2021, FOOT ANKLE INT, V42, P510, DOI 10.1177/1071100721997149
  29. Usuelli F, 2011, FOOT ANKLE INT, V32, P782, DOI 10.3113/FAI.2011.0782
  30. Welck MJ, 2018, FOOT ANKLE CLIN, V23, P183, DOI 10.1016/j.fcl.2018.01.002

Coleções
Artigos e Materiais de Revistas Científicas - HC/IOT